This is the first in a series of blog posts examining the
subject of “Authentic Leadership.”
Abstract
What does it mean to be authentic? What does authentic
leadership look like? What are the qualities and characteristics of an
authentic leader? What deterrents are there to being authentic? Is authenticity
a help or deterrent to strategic communication? What is the place of
vulnerability and truthfulness in being authentic? To what leadership models
should authentic leaders be compared? In this series of blog posts we will
address these questions along with the postulation that authentic leadership
must be measured universally against the servant leadership model exemplified
by Jesus Christ, and individually against the specific gifts and purpose each
individual has been endowed with by their Creator.
Authentic Leadership – Part 1
Being Authentic
What Does it Mean to
be Authentic?
I remember watching Kevin Kostner’s (1990) Academy Award
winning motion picture Dances with Wolves
for the first time. The opening scene panned across a hodgepodge of civil War
gear strewn about among wounded and bleeding soldiers. I was immediately
impressed with the detail of the authentic looking items as they passed by the
big screen. Even the stitching on the boots and the nails used to attach the
heels were definitely different from what would be seen today. Later, I saw a
behind-the-scenes feature about the making of the movie. The producers
explained how they went to great lengths to be sure that every prop and costume
was made authentically to the same specifications as what was actually used in
the Civil War. These were not genuine Civil War artifacts, but authentic
reproductions. In this sense, being authentic is not the same as being genuine.
Merriam-Webster (2016) defines the word authentic as…
…worthy of acceptance or belief as
conforming to or based on fact… conforming to an original so as to reproduce
essential features… made or done the same way as an original… not false or
imitation: real, actual… true to one’s personality, spirit, or character (Mirriam-Webster, 2016).
In each definition, authenticity has to do with conforming
to, copying, reproducing or having the same characteristics as an original.
Even being “true to one’s own personality, spirit, or character” implies
comparing one’s behavior against previous norms. Therefore we may surmise that
authenticity occurs only in comparison to something. This should not, however,
imply that being authentic means something or someone is false or merely an
imitation. A Civil War boot that is made with the same materials, using the
same tools, and to the same specifications as the original boots is as real as
the genuine article even if not the original. With this understanding of what
it means to be authentic, we must also ask what we are comparing authenticity
against.
Susan Scott (2004) expresses the belief that one cannot
enjoy the life, make the decisions or be the leader they are capable of being
unless their actions represent an authentic representation of who they really
are. As authenticity relates to conversation, she admonishes, “You must
deliberately, purposely come out from behind yourself into the conversation an
make it real—at least your part of
it” (p. 67). Scott’s definition of being authentic accentuates individualism.
It is a process that begins “—when you cease to compare yourself with others
and choose, instead, to live your life… It is a deepening integrity—when who
you are and what you live are brought into alignment” (pp. 72-73). Karl
Albrecht (2006) echoes this idea, suggesting that authenticity is the dimension
of, “how honest and sincere you are with people and with yourself, in any given
situation” (p. 87). Certainly individuals need to live their own life, discover
their own gifts and fulfill their own purpose. This involves taking
responsibility for our own actions. Steven Covey (1990) suggests that individuals should, “Look at the word responsibility
as ‘response-ability’—the ability to choose your response” (p. 71). We must
take responsibility for ourselves and be proactive. We cannot make our
experience the same as anyone else’s. The
measure of our authenticity as leaders is not in comparison to anyone else’s
experience. Yet, by definition, authenticity requires that it be validated as
compared against some original, norm or standard. If comparing ourselves with
others is being inauthentic, to what then should an authentic leader compare
him/herself?
(to be continued)
_______________
NOTE: Please visit this blog site each week (a new blog is
posted every Monday). Over the next few weeks we will be continuing more parts
on this subject of Authentic Leadership.
Next week: Part 2 - “To What Models Should Authentic
Leadership Be Compared?”
References:
Kostner, K. (Producer/Director). (1990). Dances with Wolves [Motion picture].
authentic. (2016).
In Merriam-Webster online dictionary.
Retrieved June 6, 2016,
Scott, S. (2004). Fierce
Conversations. Achieving success at work and in life, one conversation
at
a time. New York :
The Berkley Publishing Group
Albrecht, K. (2006). Social
Intelligence. The new science of success. San Francisco : Josey-Bass
Covey, S.R. (1990). The
Seven Habits of Highly Effective People. Restoring the character ethic.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thoughtful comments are always appreciated.